Main Menu

Changes to WoF system aim to save $159m annually

Started by Malcolm, January 27, 2013, 01:08:54 PM

Malcolm


Changes to WoF system aim to save $159m annually
By Claire Trevett
Updated11:19 AM Sunday Jan 27, 2013


Drivers whose cars are now less than 13 years old will only need annual warrants of fitness checks rather than six-monthly, under changes to the WOF system aimed at saving motorists $159 million a year.

Associate Transport Minister Simon Bridges has just announced the changes after reviewing the WOF system earlier in the year.

The changes include:

* new cars will have an initial inspection but no further WOF check will be required until the vehicle is three years old. After that, they will require annual inspections.

* vehicles which are more than three years old and first registered after 1 January 2000 will require annual inspections.

* older vehicles which were first registered before 1 January 2000 will still require 6-monthly checks.

Mr Bridges said the mix recognised concerns about older vehicles on the road, while also recognising that in new cars, the quality and safety features had improved over time and the six-monthly checks were unnecessary.



He said the Ministry of Transport had calculated that the changes would save motorists and businesses $159 million a year - or $1.8 billion over 30 years - including savings in inspection costs, law enforcement costs - such as fines for unwarranted vehicles - and the time spent getting a WOF.

There will also be changes for the Certificate of Fitness regime which applies to transport vehicles such as taxis and rental cars. Although the default position will be to retain six-monthly checks, the Transport Agency will have a discretion to require individual operators to undergo either more or less regular checks, between every three months to a year. That will depend on the operators' safety records. That change is expected to save between $14 million to $41 million a year.

To help address concerns raised about less frequent warrant checks, Mr Bridges said money would be put into public education campaigns and more funding for Police enforcement on warrants.

He said the changes brought New Zealand into line with other countries.

"New Zealand currently has one of the highest inspection frequencies in the world.''

He said NZTA was also reviewing the annual car licensing (registration) system, looking at ways to make paying the fee easier and reduce infringement notices by using more reminders and payment incentives such as late payment penalties.

The Motor Trade Association (MTA) said the changes would mean the loss of more than 2000 jobs because fewer inspections would need to be carried out, pushing more skilled people out of the automotive industry.

Furthermore, it would increase risks to motorists and ultimately be more expensive for them.

"Many vehicles will now be travelling twice the distance and going twice as long before undergoing the minimum safety check,'' MTA spokesman Ian Stronach said.

"Many drivers rely on this as their primary safety and operational assurance. In an automotive environment like ours, that is too long and too far.''

Mr Stronach said it was a "piecemeal deconstruction'' of the vehicle inspection regime that has served and protected motorists well for many years.

Road safety campaigner Clive Matthew-Wilson said the changes would result in more road deaths.

"Despite what people have been conned into believing, the current six-monthly WOF check is a major lifesaver.''

He dismissed Government claims that few accidents are caused by vehicle defects and that the six-monthly WOF are therefore an unnecessary expense.

"Take a typical situation where a child runs out in front of your car. Whether or not that child gets killed may well depend on the state of your vehicle's brakes and shock absorbers,'' he said.

The Government had done a brilliant job of presenting the changes as a measure to save ordinary motorists time and money, when actually the average motorist would save very little and may lose a lot, he said.

kierbear

so basicly...avengers will still need 6 monthly checks? i dont really mind that!
Li'l Blu

JoKer

6 months? I aim for that but it rarely happens LOL

avenga


1975 Hillman Avenger 1300 Super, 1972 Chrysler Valiant Charger 770, 1980 Chrysler Avenger 1.3GL

http://www.carphotos.co.nz
RPM Photography

kierbear

hahaha mine occur approx 7 monthly. Should be getting one in 2 weeks, got a couple things to do
Li'l Blu

azza1600

dont ring me chick!!! mine just flu thru one yesterday :)

kierbear

haha nah its pretty straightfoward shit. 2 front tyres, tighten handbrake, weld exhaust. thats all that SHOULD have to be done
Li'l Blu

Muzza

So does that mean when I get my Avenger re certed and re registered (still seems along way off) I will only need to get WOF check once a year

avenga

Nope, it is from when it was first registered not when it was re-registered. So you will still need to suffer the 6 month WOF.

It is a bit of a joke for some old cars. The WOF is up in my Charger and I would be luckly if I have done 100 miles since my last WOF.

1975 Hillman Avenger 1300 Super, 1972 Chrysler Valiant Charger 770, 1980 Chrysler Avenger 1.3GL

http://www.carphotos.co.nz
RPM Photography

azza1600

Its a joke alrite Rich, just got my Avenger a wof last one it had was when we had the hawkes bay meet, only dne 1000ks or so and most of them with no wof lol, my bad :)

avenga

They should have made it that cars over 40 years old need WOF based on distance.

They have cheap rego for 40 year old cars so why not bring the WOF system in line with that.

Most people with 40+ year old cars are enthusiasts so there cars would be in better mechanical shape than most cars out there.

1975 Hillman Avenger 1300 Super, 1972 Chrysler Valiant Charger 770, 1980 Chrysler Avenger 1.3GL

http://www.carphotos.co.nz
RPM Photography

kierbear

lol i dont mind making studylink fork out $40 every 6 months
Li'l Blu